Crypto Funding Rates

Live cross-venue comparison · 2163 markets

As of 2026-10-20 11:20 UTC, BTC funding ranged from -0.0020% to 0.0145% per 8h across 9 venues (median 0.0080%). That snapshot holds 2163 perpetual markets from 14 venues. The widest 8h gap among assets listed on 3 or more venues was UNITREE: -1.1826% on edgeX versus 0.0000% on Aster.

Positive = longs pay shorts (red). Negative = shorts pay longs (green).

Updated 14/14 venues · as of 11:20 UTC · how this is computed

Widest funding gaps between venues

The five assets (listed on 4 or more venues, liquid legs only) whose 8h funding differs most from the lowest venue to the highest.

AssetLong here (lowest 8h)Short here (highest 8h)Spread 8hAnnualized spread
CASHCATedgeX -0.0712%Hyperliquid 0.0100%0.0812%88.8680%
GRAMHyperliquid -0.0124%Lighter 0.0552%0.0676%73.9687%
PONSLighter -0.0544%edgeX 0.0108%0.0652%71.3611%
WLFIOKX 0.0023%Aster 0.0669%0.0647%70.7930%
GOOGLedgeX -0.0528%Lighter 0.0112%0.0640%70.1107%

Full arbitrage scanner →

Funding rates by coin

Dedicated live cross-venue pages for the most widely listed perps, each with a venue table, summary statistics, a funding cost example and history. To compare all of them side by side, open the funding rate heatmap.

Filters

Asset: example BTC · GOLD

Markets

Showing 16 of 2163 markets (filtered). Clear filters

AssetClassVenue1h8hAPRIntervalNext fundingStatusL / S
TSLAstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0006%0.0050%5.4750%1hin 34mopen—
NVDAstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0006%0.0050%5.4750%1hin 34mopen—
HOODstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0018%0.0145%15.8906%1hin 34mopen—
INTCstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0006%0.0050%5.4750%1hin 34mopen—
PLTRstockHyperliquid (xyz)-0.0007%-0.0058%-6.3042%1hin 34mopen—
COINstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0006%0.0050%5.4750%1hin 34mopen—
METAstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0011%0.0088%9.6196%1hin 34mopen—
AAPLstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0006%0.0050%5.4750%1hin 34mopen—
MSFTstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0006%0.0050%5.4750%1hin 34mopen—
ORCLstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0006%0.0050%5.4750%1hin 34mopen—
GOOGLstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0006%0.0050%5.4750%1hin 34mopen—
AMZNstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0006%0.0050%5.4750%1hin 34mopen—
AMDstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0006%0.0050%5.4750%1hin 34mopen—
MSTRstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0022%0.0177%19.3708%1hin 34mopen—
NFLXstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0009%0.0072%7.9381%1hin 34mopen—
BABAstockHyperliquid (xyz)0.0006%0.0050%5.4750%1hin 34mopen—

LeverUp on this dashboard

LeverUp lists gold, FX, indices and stocks as perps you trade from a web3 wallet with up to 50x leverage (from data). Its traditional-asset markets and major crypto markets such as BTC and ETH are routed to Hyperliquid, so their funding equals Hyperliquid's; the difference is leverage and wallet-based trading, not cheaper funding. Only its on-chain pool crypto markets (BNB, DOGE, LINK, LIT, MON, PEPE, QNT, SOL, SUI, TRX, UNI, XMR, XRP, ZEC) charge a funding rate plus a per-side holding fee, so long and short costs differ.

Trade on LeverUp

Methodology

Short version (the full methodology page has the formulas and caveats): we pull public funding endpoints from each venue every 10 minutes, normalize rates to an hourly decimal (rate per interval ÷ interval hours), then derive 8h and simple APR (×24×365). Sign convention: positive means longs pay shorts. Binance and Bybit fall back to Hyperliquid predictedFundings when direct APIs are geo-blocked. GMX publishes an annualised rate (scaled by 1e30), which we divide by 8,760; GMX is shown in tables but kept out of spread math because its pool-skew funding and borrowing fee are not comparable with order-book funding.

FAQ

What is a funding rate?

Periodic payment between long and short perp traders tied to the premium vs index.

Why positive vs negative?

Crowding on one side vs index price.

Payment frequency?

Varies: 1h HL/dYdX/LP cross; 4h edgeX; 8h many CEX; continuous LP pool/Paradex/GMX.

Compare 1h and 8h?

Divide the interval rate by interval hours.

Weekend closed labels?

Fri 21:00 – Sun 22:00 UTC for trad assets without venue flags.

Other costs?

Borrow/holding fees on GMX and LP pool.